Hello again ! So many questions, hope your not too busy. When I first started running in February, I remember reading that heel striking was good form, and this allowed your foot to roll naturally etc etc.. however, I have since read articles contradicting this advise suggesting that a mid foot / ball of foot landing sends less reaction to the upper body preventing injury.
I had tried to modify my form to heel strike and now I read this.... confused ? ! ?
Please help.
Regards Neil (UK)
Answer by Dominique:
Hi Neil, Thx for your running training question. I should start charging for this service (no worries, I won't)... It's a great debate isn't: what is better, ball of the foot landing or heel strike? Another good one is about whether cross-training is good for you or not. Everyone seems to have an opinion.
I am a "heel striker" as well, as many other runners are. Some others land on the ball of the foot and they feel that that comes naturally to them.
Heel striking is the more traditional running form. In the last few years the Pose Technique, the technique which uses ball of foot landing, has been getting quite some publicity.
I do not have sufficient knowledge about running form, sports physiology etc to tell you to use the one method or the other. The truth is probably in the middle. Do what makes you feel best, do what comes naturally to you and that is probably the right running technique for you.
Subscribe to the Best Running Tips Newsletter and get a FREE e-book !!
Hope this helps. Looking forward to your next question! Cheers, Dominique
Interesting Point of View... by: Dominique (webmaster)
Hi I. Viola, I liked your post very much. Sounds like you have given the issue some good thought.
Barefoot running has become really popular, especially since Born to Run was published and became a bit of a bestseller. The writer provides quite a compelling argument for barefoot running, but I agree, running surfaces today are not what they used to be thousands of years ago.
Through their design, these shoes make you gravitate towards ball-of-the-foot running, however still with providing you the protection of running shoes.
The Vibram Five Fingers, basically a "glove for your feet" are a real hit and I have seen people run with them in street races. They look cool, but don't offer a hell of a lot of protection it seems. I wonder about the longer term effects on people's feet or about incidents with sharp objects etc.
Then again, the whole argument for barefoot running is that our feet are strong enough themselves and don't need any protection.
Tough, tough, tough, I will see if I can get in contact with the Newton running company and throw some questions their way regarding this issue, I find it very interesting. When/if I get some answers, I will publish it in my Best Running Tips Newsletter.
Cheers, Dominique (webmaster)
"Natural" running on "unnatural" surfaces? by: I. Viola
I understand the argument that humans are natural runners, and that running shoes are a modern invention. But so is pavement. I would think that running barefoot on bare ground, grass, or sand might be the ideal, but running on asphalt or cement without some added shock absorber doesn't make any sense to me. What is the current thought on this?
The argument that the running shoe industry is just in place to hose us is an argument that could be made for all non-essential consumer goods. I would urge us to take pause and consider which sporting equipment (paddles, life preservers, sails for boats, balls for games, visors and eye protection for various sports, bicycles, wetsuits, baseball bats, gloves, rock climbing equipment, helmets, pick your sport and the list goes on...) may give us a more efficient, safer, or more enjoyable way to exercise and move our bodies than the "natural" forms we were born with.
I would also argue that technological innovations are "natural" responses to our desire to expand our ability to move over terrain, through the water, and against or with the wind. I agree that there is a lot of junk out there, and plenty of folks just trying to make a buck, but we shouldn't throw the good equipment/accessories out with the bad.
Don't Heelstrike (please) by: Anonymous
Actually, a midfoot/forefoot strike is the way humans are designed to run. If you take off your shoes and go for a run you will find it impossible to heelstrike. if you use your legs and feet the way they were designed they will reduce the force of the impacts far more effectively than any shoe that has ever been designed. Again, humans are natural runners, and the notion that we must by expensive shoes in order to run has been propagated by shoe companies to sell more shoes.
Need help with your running?
Then check out my NEWBest Running Coach Coaching Service.
Offers in-depth analysis of your current situation, strengths and weaknesses and a custom-tailored running program that brings results.
BEST MARATHON PLAN
Do you want to run your first or fastest marathon? Find out how to train for a marathon the right way with the 100 Day Marathon Plan. Of all the marathon plans I have seen this is the best.
When you are a runner, you are doing intervals. The Gymboss is a really clever and cheap piece of running gear that makes interval running a lot more comfortable. Check out the Gymboss review to find out why.
WEIGHT LOSS
Do you need to lose weight? And want a little bit of help? Then check out the "How to Lose 10 Pounds" ebook. It's not about pills, potions or powders, but about stuff that works.